These profiles are improved by the materials team. This is directly copied from them and should now be optimised for our use.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
When there is 1 extruder, the frontend stores all settings in the global stack. Sending an extruder stack confuses CuraEngine into using the values of the extruder stack, which results in defaults being used.
This translation is only translating the setting descriptions. However it is also missing one translation: smooth spiralized contours. We decided not to block these translations just for that one. It was also missing another translation: Support bottom pattern. I inferred that from the description of Support Roof Pattern, basically doing the translation myself.
Contributes to issue CURA-3950.
Because of this wrong MIME type, the material profile would get saved using the preferred extension of the instance container, .inst.cfg. This would then get interpreted as having the MIME type of instance containers, and then it would fail to load because it is not an INI file.
Now it stores it as .xml.fdm_material and so the MIME type database interprets it as an XML file.
Contributes to issue CURA-3937.
There's one copy for every stack. It doesn't matter which one we take as long as they have the same name. Global is always present, even in single extrusion. Seems the most logical one to display.
Contributes to issue CURA-3935.
NB: previously the "approximate_diameter" metadata was stored as a number. This caused some issues passing arguments from QML to Python. Now "approximate_diameter" is stored as a string.
Otherwise you get layers where the prime tower isn't printed because it is less than twice the line width, and then the prime tower falls away. I'm sure this was the whole intent of this 'max()' clause but it was executed wrongly.
Now that users have gradual infill available as option in recommended mode, it was deemed better to let the user choose when he wants it. I left the step height intact, in case the user chooses it anyway.
If it's less, the layer doesn't get properly filled, according to the materials team. They requested that the thickness should be set to 0.225mm for just the Fine and Extra Fine profiles, but I opted for a formula that would still let it scale with the layer height up to a point.
These are the translations we got from Bothof. They are unabridged, no edits are made. They are not checked yet. I'm going to do that afterwards.
Contributes to issue CURA-3885.
CURA-3884
We rely on the machine to decide whether it needs machine specific
materials, so we don't override the filter_by_material flag when
looking for quality profiles for a material.
