POWER10 has a quirk in its ChipTOD addressing that requires the even
small-core to be selected even when programming the odd small-core.
This allows skiboot chiptod init to run in big-core mode.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
POWER9 and POWER10 machines come in two variants, big-core and
small-core. Big-core machines are SMT8 from software's point of view,
but the low level platform topology ("xscom registers and pervasive
addressing"), these look more like a pair of small cores ganged
together.
Presently the way this is modelled is to create one SMT8 PnvCore and add
special cases to xscom and pervasive for big-core mode that tries to
split this into two small cores, but this is becoming too complicated to
manage.
A better approach is to create 2 core structures and ganging them
together to look like an SMT8 core in TCG. Then the xscom and pervasive
models mostly do not need to differentiate big and small core modes.
This change adds initial mode bits and QEMU topology handling to
split SMT8 cores into 2xSMT4 cores.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
The chip_pir chip class method allows the platform to set the PIR
processor identification register. Extend this to a more general
ID function which also allows the TIR to be set. This is in
preparation for "big core", which is a more complicated topology
of cores and threads.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Use a class attribute to specify the number of SMT threads per core
permitted for different machines, 8 for powernv8 and 4 for powernv9/10.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
SPRC/SPRD were recently added to all BookS CPUs supported, but
they are only tested on POWER9 and POWER10, so restrict them to
those CPUs.
SPR indirect scratch registers presently replicated per-CPU like
SMT SPRs, but the PnvCore is a better place for them since they
are restricted to P9/P10.
Also add SPR indirect read access to core thread state for POWER9
since skiboot accesses that when booting to check for big-core
mode.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
The timebase state machine is per per-core state and can be driven
by any thread in the core. It is currently implemented as a hack
where the state is in a CPU structure and only thread 0's state is
accessed by the chiptod, which limits programming the timebase
side of the state machine to thread 0 of a core.
Move the state out into PnvCore and share it among all threads.
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
This helps move core state from CPU to core structures.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
One of the functions of the ADU is indirect memory access engines that
send and receive data via ADU registers.
This implements the ADU LPC memory access functionality sufficiently
for IBM proprietary firmware to access the UART and print characters
to the serial port as it does on real hardware.
This requires a linkage between adu and lpc, which allows adu to
perform memory access in the lpc space.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
This implements a framework for an ADU unit model.
The ADU unit actually implements XSCOM, which is the bridge between MMIO
and PIB. However it also includes control and status registers and other
functions that are exposed as PIB (xscom) registers.
To keep things simple, pnv_xscom.c remains the XSCOM bridge
implementation, and pnv_adu.c implements the ADU registers and other
functions.
So far, just the ADU no-op registers in the pnv_xscom.c default handler
are moved over to the adu model.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
The POWER8 LPC ISA device irqs all get combined and reported to the line
connected the PSI LPCHC irq. POWER9 changed this so only internal LPC
host controller irqs use that line, and the device irqs get routed to
4 new lines connected to PSI SERIRQ0-3.
POWER9 also introduced a new feature that automatically clears the irq
status in the LPC host controller when EOI'ed, so software does not have
to.
The powernv OPAL (skiboot) firmware managed to work because the LPCHC
irq handler scanned all LPC irqs and handled those including clearing
status even on POWER9 systems. So LPC irqs worked despite OPAL thinking
it was running in POWER9 mode. After this change, UART interrupts show
up on serirq1 which is where OPAL routes them to:
cat /proc/interrupts
...
20: 0 XIVE-IRQ 1048563 Level opal-psi#0:lpchc
...
25: 34 XIVE-IRQ 1048568 Level opal-psi#0:lpc_serirq_mux1
Whereas they previously turn up on lpchc.
Reviewed-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
The LPC HC irq status register bits are set when an LPC IRQSER input is
asserted. These irq status bits drive the PSI irq to the CPU interrupt
controller. The LPC HC irq status bits are cleared by software writing
to the register with 1's for the bits to clear.
Existing register write was clearing the irq status bits even when the
input was asserted, this results in interrupts being lost.
This fix changes the behavior to keep track of the device IRQ status
in internal state that is separate from the irq status register, and
only allowing the irq status bits to be cleared if the associated
input is not asserted.
Signed-off-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.ibm.com>
[np: rebased before P9 PSI SERIRQ patch, adjust changelog/comments]
Reviewed-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
This cap did not add the migration code when it was introduced. This
results in migration failure when changing the default using the
command line.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: ccc5a4c5e1 ("spapr: Add SPAPR_CAP_AIL_MODE_3 for AIL mode 3 support for H_SET_MODE hcall")
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Use the unified interface to call confidential guest related kvm_init()
and kvm_reset(), to avoid exposing pef specific functions.
As a bonus, pef.h goes away since there is no direct call from sPAPR
board code to PEF code anymore.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Introduce a SPAPR capability cap-nested-papr which enables nested PAPR
API for nested guests. This new API is to enable support for KVM on PowerVM
and the support in Linux kernel has already merged upstream.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
For nested PAPR API, we use SpaprMachineStateNestedGuest struct to store
partition table info, use the same in spapr_get_pate_nested() via
helper.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Introduce the nested PAPR hcalls:
- H_GUEST_GET_STATE which is used to get state of a nested guest or
a guest VCPU. The value field for each element in the request is
destination to be updated to reflect current state on success.
- H_GUEST_SET_STATE which is used to modify the state of a guest or
a guest VCPU. On success, guest (or its VCPU) state shall be
updated as per the value field for the requested element(s).
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Nested PAPR API provides a standard Guest State Buffer (GSB) format
with unique IDs for each guest state element for which get/set state is
supported by the API. Some of the elements are read-only and/or guest-wide.
Introducing additional required GSB elements and helper routines for state
exchange of each of the nested guest state elements for which get/set state
should be supported by the API.
[amachhiw: set the PCR whenever logical PVR is set]
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Currently, nested_ppc_state stores a certain set of registers and works
with nested_[load|save]_state() for state transfer as reqd for nested-hv API.
Extending these with additional registers state as reqd for nested PAPR API.
Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Introduce the nested PAPR hcall H_GUEST_CREATE_VCPU which is used to
create and initialize the specified VCPU resource for the previously
created guest. Each guest can have multiple VCPUs upto max 2048.
All VCPUs for a guest gets deallocated on guest delete.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Introduce the nested PAPR hcalls:
- H_GUEST_CREATE which is used to create and allocate resources for
nested guest being created.
- H_GUEST_DELETE which is used to delete and deallocate resources
for the nested guest being deleted. It also supports deleting all nested
guests at once using a deleteAll flag.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Introduce the nested PAPR hcalls:
- H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES which is used to query the capabilities
of the API and the L2 guests it provides.
- H_GUEST_SET_CAPABILITIES which is used to set the Guest API
capabilities that the Host Partition supports and may use.
[amachhiw: support for p9 compat mode and return register bug fixes]
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
spapr_exit_nested and spapr_get_pate_nested_hv contains code which
is specific to nested-hv API. Isolating code flows based on API
helps extending it to be used with different API as well.
Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Currently, nested_ptcr is being used by existing nested-hv API to store
nested guest related info. This need to be organised to extend support
for the nested PAPR API which would need to store additional info
related to nested guests in next series of patches.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Most of the nested code has already been moved to spapr_nested.c
This logic inside spapr_get_pate is related to nested guests and
better suited for spapr_nested.c, hence moving there.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Since cap-nested-hv is an optional capability, it makes sense to register
api specfic hcalls only when respective capability is enabled. This
requires to introduce a new API to unregister hypercalls to maintain
sanity across guest reboot since caps are re-applied across reboots and
re-registeration of hypercalls would hit assert otherwise.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Big (SMT8) cores have a complicated function to map the core, thread ID
to pervasive topology (PIR). Fix this for power8, power9, and power10.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Caleb Schlossin <calebs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
One of the functions of the ChipTOD is to transfer TOD to the Core
(aka PC - Pervasive Core) timebase facility.
The ChipTOD can be programmed with a target address to send the TOD
value to. The hardware implementation seems to perform this by
sending the TOD value to a SCOM address.
This implementation grabs the core directly and manipulates the
timebase facility state in the core. This is a hack, but it works
enough for now. A better implementation would implement the transfer
to the PnvCore xscom register and drive the timebase state machine
from there.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Wire the ChipTOD model to powernv9 and powernv10 machines.
Suggested-by-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
The ChipTOD (for Time-Of-Day) is a chip pervasive facility in IBM POWER
(powernv) processors that keeps a time of day clock.
In particular for this model are facilities that initialise and start
the time of day clock, and that synchronise that clock to cores on the
chip, and to other chips. In this way, all cores on all chips can
synchronise timebase (TB).
This model implements functionality sufficient to run the skiboot
chiptod synchronisation procedure (with the following core timebase
state machine implementation). It does not modify the TB in the cores
where the real hardware would, because the QEMU ppc timebase
implementation is always synchronised acros all cores.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
This part of the patchset connects the nest1 chiplet model to p10 chip.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Chalapathi V <chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
The N1 chiplet handle the high speed i/o traffic over PCIe and others.
The N1 chiplet consists of PowerBus Fabric controller,
nest Memory Management Unit, chiplet control unit and more.
This commit creates a N1 chiplet model and initialize and realize the
pervasive chiplet model where chiplet control registers are implemented.
This commit also implement the read/write method for the powerbus scom
registers
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Chalapathi V <chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
