The reason the ppc64 and s390x test where failing was because gdb
hides them although they are still accessible via regnum. We can
re-arrange the test a little bit and include these two arches in our
test.
We also need to be a bit more careful handling remote-registers as the
format isn't easily parsed with pure white space separation. Once we
fold types like "long long" and "long double" into a single word we
can now assert all registers are either listed or elided.
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Cc: <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231121153606.542101-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
We already do a couple of "info registers" for specific tests but this
is a more comprehensive multiarch test. It also has some output
helpful for debugging the gdbstub by showing which XML features are
advertised and what the underlying register numbers are.
My initial motivation was to see if there are any duplicate register
names exposed via the gdbstub while I was reviewing the proposed
register interface for TCG plugins.
Mismatches between the xml and remote-desc are reported for debugging
but do not fail the test.
We also skip the tests for the following arches for now until we can
investigate and fix any issues:
- s390x (fails to read v0l->v15l, not seen in remote-registers)
- ppc64 (fails to read vs0h->vs31h, not seen in remote-registers)
Cc: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231106185112.2755262-7-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
