With Makefiles that have automatically generated dependencies, you
generated includes are set as dependencies of the Makefile, so that they
are built before everything else and they are available when first
building the .c files.
Alternatively you can use a fine-grained dependency, e.g.
target/arm/translate.o: target/arm/decode-neon-shared.inc.c
With Meson you have only one choice and it is a third option, namely
"build at the beginning of the corresponding target"; the way you
express it is to list the includes in the sources of that target.
The problem is that Meson decides if something is a source vs. a
generated include by looking at the extension: '.c', '.cc', '.m', '.C'
are sources, while everything else is considered an include---including
'.inc.c'.
Use '.c.inc' to avoid this, as it is consistent with our other convention
of using '.rst.inc' for included reStructuredText files. The editorconfig
file is adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
While running the GCC test suite against 4.0.0-rc0, Kito found a
regression introduced by the decodetree conversion that caused divuw and
remuw to sign-extend their inputs. The ISA manual says they are
supposed to be zero extended:
DIVW and DIVUW instructions are only valid for RV64, and divide the
lower 32 bits of rs1 by the lower 32 bits of rs2, treating them as
signed and unsigned integers respectively, placing the 32-bit
quotient in rd, sign-extended to 64 bits. REMW and REMUW
instructions are only valid for RV64, and provide the corresponding
signed and unsigned remainder operations respectively. Both REMW
and REMUW always sign-extend the 32-bit result to 64 bits, including
on a divide by zero.
Here's Kito's reduced test case from the GCC test suite
unsigned calc_mp(unsigned mod)
{
unsigned a,b,c;
c=-1;
a=c/mod;
b=0-a*mod;
if (b > mod) { a += 1; b-=mod; }
return b;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
unsigned x = 1234;
unsigned y = calc_mp(x);
if ((sizeof (y) == 4 && y != 680)
|| (sizeof (y) == 2 && y != 134))
abort ();
exit (0);
}
I haven't done any other testing on this, but it does fix the test case.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
