OrcaSlicer/doc/material_settings/pellet-flow-coefficient.md
Ian Bassi 4ec16fd714
Some checks are pending
Build all / Build All (push) Waiting to run
Build all / Flatpak (push) Waiting to run
Publish docs to Wiki / Publish docs to Wiki (push) Waiting to run
Wiki Update part 5 (#9873)
* BASE

* precise wall and z moved

* PolyHoles

* Arc-fitting

* X-Y Compensation

* Elephant foot + moved images

* Update quality_settings_precision.md

* Wall generator and more

* Full Reorder

* TPMS-D bases

* Update strength_settings_infill.md

* Image Fix + Infill desc calculator

* Descriptions + image fix

Co-Authored-By: Rodrigo <162915171+RF47@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update cornering-calib.md

* minor fixes

* Wip updated

* Missing fills

* Update infill_desc_calculator.xlsx

* Update infill_desc_calculator.xlsx

* Update infill documentation and images

Removed outdated 'iso' infill images and updated 'top' infill images with new versions. Added new images for adaptive cubic and 2D honeycomb infill patterns. Updated strength_settings_infill.md to revise infill strength values, descriptions, and remove references to deleted images. Introduced documentation for 2D honeycomb infill and made minor corrections and clarifications throughout.

* Revise infill pattern documentation and add comparison table

Updated strength_settings_infill.md to clarify infill density calculation, add a comprehensive comparison table of infill patterns, and standardize terminology for strength and print time. Expanded pattern descriptions to use qualitative strength ratings instead of numeric values. Updated infill_desc_calculator.xlsx to reflect these changes.

* Indentation in  code examples

Adjusted the indentation of code blocks in the cornering calibration documentation for clarity and consistency with the rest of the document.

* Update 3D Honeycomb infill strength ratings

Adjusted the horizontal strength rating for 3D Honeycomb infill from 'Normal' to 'Normal-High' in the strength settings documentation and table. Updated the infill_desc_calculator.xlsx file to reflect these changes.

* Formatting and fix in ERS documentation

Updated headings to use consistent Markdown syntax, improved clarity in explanations, and reworded references for better readability.

* Fix wall generator doc link and filename

Updated the Home.md to reference the correct 'quality_settings_wall_generator' section and renamed the corresponding documentation file for consistency.

---------

Co-authored-by: Rodrigo <162915171+RF47@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-20 10:19:48 +08:00

1.4 KiB

Pellet Flow Coefficient

Large format printers with print volumes in the order of 1m^3 generally use pellets for printing. The overall tech is very similar to FDM printing. It is FDM printing, but instead of filaments, it uses pellets.

The difference here is that where filaments have a filament_diameter that is used to calculate the volume of filament ingested, pellets have a particular flow_coefficient that is empirically devised for that particular pellet.

pellet_flow_coefficient is basically a measure of the packing density of a particular pellet. Shape, material and density of an individual pellet will determine the packing density and the only thing that matters for 3d printing is how much of that pellet material is extruded by one turn of whatever feeding mehcanism/gear your printer uses. You can emperically derive that for your own pellets for a particular printer model.

We are translating the pellet_flow_coefficient into filament_diameter so that everything works just like it does already with very minor adjustments.

\text{filament\_diameter} = \sqrt{\frac{4 \times \text{pellet\_flow\_coefficient}}{\pi}}

sqrt just makes the relationship between flow_coefficient and volume linear.

higher packing density -> more material extruded by single turn -> higher pellet_flow_coefficient -> treated as if a filament of larger diameter is being used All other calculations remain the same for slicing.