Now that users have gradual infill available as option in recommended mode, it was deemed better to let the user choose when he wants it. I left the step height intact, in case the user chooses it anyway.
If it's less, the layer doesn't get properly filled, according to the materials team. They requested that the thickness should be set to 0.225mm for just the Fine and Extra Fine profiles, but I opted for a formula that would still let it scale with the layer height up to a point.
For the 0.8mm profiles the variants specify 5%, so we remove it from those profiles. The 0.4mm variants specify 15% so for those we need to override it.
The UM3 definition sets the setting to 3mm. Nothing else sets it to another value except FDM Printer. I left the UM3 setting in and removed all travel_avoid_distance settings in the UM3 profiles.
These updates bring different speeds for support-top vs. support-bottom, and changes the bottom pattern now that they are separately configurable. I also sorted the BB0.8 variant alphabetically (raft settings were out of place).
The profile name is 'Draft' so this makes it easier to find. This also makes it consistent with the rest of the profile file names. It's good to do this before we need to make a version upgrade for it.
This was found by the materials team to be a better value. All UM3 profiles have 20 now. I've left the third-party machines intact which override the prime tower size but those that didn't override the prime tower size have their prime tower size altered as well.
infill_overlap and infill_overlap_mm were in conflict with each other. Went to the Materials team to resolve it. They say it should be 0.
Contributes to issue CURA-3650.
The 3mm was computed from wanting 7 lines, but in that calculation I used a line width of 0.4mm. This is obviously wrong, since for 0.8mm profiles the line width is 0.8mm.
Contributes to issue CURA-3650.
These optimisations should only remove settings that are exactly equal to the parent profile. Support interface settings are an exception, since they were defining non-existing settings in the original profiles. The stand-by temperature is also an exception, since the stand-by temperature of the material profile is set in stone because of firmware.
Contributes to issue CURA-3650.
Otherwise it acts as if the settings were the defaults for FDMPrinter rather than defaulting to the current UM3 settings.
Contributes to issue CURA-3650.
Sample testing confirms that these are equal to their originals. Nylon, PLA and PVA were already optimised, but ABS and CPE weren't. Now all are optimised except some 0.4mm core profiles. I'll see to those next. Note that the filament flow compensation setting is still wrong in these profiles (it was wrong in the original profiles as well).
Contributes to issue CURA-3650.
There have been some problems in the optimization of these profiles, so we undo this for now, preventing people from editing these materials and risking some warnings in Cura's interface, but providing the correct experience for people trying the new materials.
