There could be an environment error when saving that file because of access rights or insufficient disk space. Catch that error and display an error message to the user. The log then contains more information on exactly why it failed, but the user just knows it fails.
Fixes Sentry issue CURA-21W.
When using the visibility of the progress bar to detect if a job is already being sent, then make actually sure the progress bar is visible the moment the job starts, not at some unspecified time later in a method that might not even trigger if there is already a mesh ... so it's unlikely to even work, since the thing it was intended to prevent _very_ likely has the same mesh anyway.
CURA-8004
Took a while to figure out exactly what to do here. But the task itself is simple.
The Ultimaker software apparently doesn't accept special characters here. The regex here is exactly the inverse of the regex that they use to accept job names.
Done as a 5 minute fix.
One of the reasons this bug (see parent of this commit ... or the issue nr if you have internal access) was so vague is that A. the user was insufficiently prompted, and B. no one could find anything in our logs.
CURA-8004
Since we use that to detect when the mesh is already uploaded, and thus can be reprinted, this could cause problems, since, while we do properly set it to None when an error is returned, if the request never returns to us, or if a reprint is started while the mesh is still uploading, the print-job cache could be set while the mesh wasn't actually there yet. Which could in theory have maybe caused the problems we see.
CURA-8004
There could be other methods of connecting than the network connectivity of the UM3NetworkPrinting plug-in. For instance, perhaps other network connection plug-ins can provide information in this monitor stage. Or the user might want to use a USB cable.
I'm explicitly quite vague about how it should be connected because this label should work for all types of connections except UM3NetworkPrinting.
Fixes#9444.
If the user account scope is outdated, delete it when upgrading from 4.8 to 4.9. This means that
the user will have to log in again, to make sure they get the correct account scope.
CURA-8093
If the 4.8 is started from a clean install and no category gets expanded in the settings panel,
then the "categories_expanded" key will not exist in the [cura] preferences in cura.cfg.
As a result, when the 4.9 gets started in this specific case, the version upgrade 48 to 49 will
produce a crash and will be considered as "failed", which will then lead to cura requesting from
the user to go from the entire onboarding flow instead of landing on the "What's new" pages (even
though everything else has been properly updated).
This commit fixes that by checking whether the "categories_expanded" key exists in the cura.cfg.
The Cura 4.9 release will have expanded functionality. If you have a plug-in that uses this functionality, marking it as using SDK 7.5.0 will notify older Cura releases that they can't use that plug-in.
The DisplayProgressOnLCD script was changed and the "time_remaining" was split into two settings:
the "time_remaining" and the "time_remaining_method". If the "time_remaining" was enabled, the
"time_remaining_method" should be set to "m117".
The VersionUpgrader48to49 was changing the "time_remaining" to "m117" instead of changing the
"time_remaining_method", which was leading to the "time_remaining" having a wrong value and not
being interpreted as a boolean.
This commit fixes that by setting the "time_remaining_method" into "m117" when the "time_remaining"
was True.
CURA-8110
If the range of the colour spectrum is 0, i.e. there is only one value for the current colour spectrum, then this would previously give a division by 0 in the shader, causing the final colour to become black. This is unexpected and makes the layer view hard to read. Instead, we'll now use the middle of the range then.
This was likely a problem for a long time but only really became visible due to the colour spectrum now showing only the range of values for the visible structures. Previously it was a problem e.g. for layer thickness if all layers had the same thickness (i.e. initial layer height == layer height).
The input array here is 2D, but always 1 by N long. The output of where then gives a tuple of two arrays, one indicating the Y positions and the other the X positions. The X positions were therefore always 0. The amin and amax functions were then always taking this index 0 along in their results, regardless of whether the line at that index was visible at all or not.
This will also improve performance since it's checking the limits now only for half as many indices.
This prevents previous measurements from influencing the colour scheme. Essentially previously it was showing the colour scheme based on all lines you had ever seen, rather than just the line types you were currently seeing.
If the user makes certain structures visible or invisible, and this then causes the limits of the colour scheme to change, this now triggers the layer view to be re-rendered and updates the legend in the simulation view menu component.
This is just a refactor that shouldn't have any influence on the behaviour.
It is a necessary prerequisite to be able to trigger the updating of the layer view colour spectrum more frequently, i.e. if the visible line types change.
This way, if travel moves are not currently visible in the layer view, the travel moves don't get counted with the limits to determine the colour spectrum to grade each line with. Quite often, travel moves had a much greater speed than other moves, like 120mm/s instead of the fastest printed line 60mm/s. This caused all of the layer view to be pushed into the lower end of the spectrum. It makes it hard to distinguish the differences in speed and line width because travel moves influence the spectrum so much. This way, the travel moves only influence the spectrum if they are visible. If they are visible, it might be relevant to the user. Otherwise, the user gets the full spectrum to differentiate between all the line widths and speeds.
This currently doesn't update correctly yet. That is something we'll need to fix.
All of our current layer view colour schemes are properties of a line, not of a vertex. The line has a single feedrate, a single line type, a single layer thickness, a single material colour and a single width. This is even limited by the g-code specification itself, which is unable to represent lines with varying line width. However, we store this information in the vertices, the vertex data being the only data sent to layer view since layer view is sent as polylines to the shader.
This change makes the entire line take on the colour scheme of the vertex where its representative data is stored. This data is intended for the line, not just for that vertex, so it makes sense that the entire line listens to the data of the correct vertex, not just the nearest vertex of the line's endpoint.
It is known that will cause some user scripts to default behaviour.
But this is accepted behaviour, and the benefits of not upgrading
the Cura Application version outweigh this.
