mirror of
https://github.com/Motorhead1991/qemu.git
synced 2025-08-04 08:13:54 -06:00
Fix bad error handling after memory_region_init_ram()
Symptom: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 10000000 Unexpected error in ram_block_add() at /work/armbru/qemu/exec.c:1456: upstream-qemu: cannot set up guest memory 'pc.ram': Cannot allocate memory Aborted (core dumped) Root cause: commitef701d7
screwed up handling of out-of-memory conditions. Before the commit, we report the error and exit(1), in one place, ram_block_add(). The commit lifts the error handling up the call chain some, to three places. Fine. Except it uses &error_abort in these places, changing the behavior from exit(1) to abort(), and thus undoing the work of commit3922825
"exec: Don't abort when we can't allocate guest memory". The three places are: * memory_region_init_ram() Commit4994653
(right after commitef701d7
) lifted the error handling further, through memory_region_init_ram(), multiplying the incorrect use of &error_abort. Later on, imitation of existing (bad) code may have created more. * memory_region_init_ram_ptr() The &error_abort is still there. * memory_region_init_rom_device() Doesn't need fixing, because commit33e0eb5
(soon after commitef701d7
) lifted the error handling further, and in the process changed it from &error_abort to passing it up the call chain. Correct, because the callers are realize() methods. Fix the error handling after memory_region_init_ram() with a Coccinelle semantic patch: @r@ expression mr, owner, name, size, err; position p; @@ memory_region_init_ram(mr, owner, name, size, ( - &error_abort + &error_fatal | err@p ) ); @script:python@ p << r.p; @@ print "%s:%s:%s" % (p[0].file, p[0].line, p[0].column) When the last argument is &error_abort, it gets replaced by &error_fatal. This is the fix. If the last argument is anything else, its position is reported. This lets us check the fix is complete. Four positions get reported: * ram_backend_memory_alloc() Error is passed up the call chain, ultimately through user_creatable_complete(). As far as I can tell, it's callers all handle the error sanely. * fsl_imx25_realize(), fsl_imx31_realize(), dp8393x_realize() DeviceClass.realize() methods, errors handled sanely further up the call chain. We're good. Test case again behaves: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 10000000 qemu-system-x86_64: cannot set up guest memory 'pc.ram': Cannot allocate memory [Exit 1 ] The next commits will repair the rest of commit ef701d7's damage. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1441983105-26376-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a29a37b994
commit
f8ed85ac99
62 changed files with 110 additions and 101 deletions
|
@ -2271,7 +2271,7 @@ struct omap_mpu_state_s *omap2420_mpu_init(MemoryRegion *sysmem,
|
|||
s->sdram_size);
|
||||
memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, OMAP2_Q2_BASE, &s->sdram);
|
||||
memory_region_init_ram(&s->sram, NULL, "omap2.sram", s->sram_size,
|
||||
&error_abort);
|
||||
&error_fatal);
|
||||
vmstate_register_ram_global(&s->sram);
|
||||
memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, OMAP2_SRAM_BASE, &s->sram);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue