target/riscv: use RVB in RVA22U64

From the time we added RVA22U64 until now the spec didn't declare 'RVB'
as a dependency, using zba/zbb/zbs instead. Since then the RVA22 spec
[1] added the following in the 'RVA22U64 Mandatory Extensions' section:

"B Bit-manipulation instructions

Note: The B extension comprises the Zba, Zbb, and Zbs extensions. At the
time of RVA22U64's ratification, the B extension had not yet been
defined, and so RVA22U64 explicitly mandated Zba, Zbb, and Zbs instead.
Mandating B is equivalent."

It is also equivalent to QEMU (see riscv_cpu_validate_b() in
target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c).

Finally, RVA23U64 [2] directly mentions RVB as a mandatory extension,
not citing zba/zbb/zbs.

To make it clear that RVA23U64 will extend RVA22U64 (i.e. RVA22 is a
parent of RVA23), use RVB in RVA22U64 as well.

(bios-tables-test change: RVB added to riscv,isa)

[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/src/profiles.adoc#61-rva22u64-profile
[2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/src/rva23-profile.adoc#rva23u64-profile

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20250115184316.2344583-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

target/riscv/cpu.c

@@ -2345,7 +2345,7 @@ static const PropertyInfo prop_marchid = {
 static RISCVCPUProfile RVA22U64 = {
     .parent = NULL,
     .name = "rva22u64",
-    .misa_ext = RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU,
+    .misa_ext = RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVB | RVU,
     .priv_spec = RISCV_PROFILE_ATTR_UNUSED,
     .satp_mode = RISCV_PROFILE_ATTR_UNUSED,
     .ext_offsets = {