mirror of
https://github.com/Motorhead1991/qemu.git
synced 2025-08-15 14:13:31 -06:00
docs/devel: Explain in more detail the TB chaining mechanisms
Signed-off-by: Luis Pires <luis.pires@eldorado.org.br> Message-Id: <20210601125143.191165-1-luis.pires@eldorado.org.br> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f291f45f4e
commit
a5a8b84772
1 changed files with 90 additions and 11 deletions
|
@ -11,13 +11,14 @@ performances.
|
||||||
QEMU's dynamic translation backend is called TCG, for "Tiny Code
|
QEMU's dynamic translation backend is called TCG, for "Tiny Code
|
||||||
Generator". For more information, please take a look at ``tcg/README``.
|
Generator". For more information, please take a look at ``tcg/README``.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Some notable features of QEMU's dynamic translator are:
|
The following sections outline some notable features and implementation
|
||||||
|
details of QEMU's dynamic translator.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
CPU state optimisations
|
CPU state optimisations
|
||||||
-----------------------
|
-----------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The target CPUs have many internal states which change the way it
|
The target CPUs have many internal states which change the way they
|
||||||
evaluates instructions. In order to achieve a good speed, the
|
evaluate instructions. In order to achieve a good speed, the
|
||||||
translation phase considers that some state information of the virtual
|
translation phase considers that some state information of the virtual
|
||||||
CPU cannot change in it. The state is recorded in the Translation
|
CPU cannot change in it. The state is recorded in the Translation
|
||||||
Block (TB). If the state changes (e.g. privilege level), a new TB will
|
Block (TB). If the state changes (e.g. privilege level), a new TB will
|
||||||
|
@ -31,17 +32,95 @@ Direct block chaining
|
||||||
---------------------
|
---------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
After each translated basic block is executed, QEMU uses the simulated
|
After each translated basic block is executed, QEMU uses the simulated
|
||||||
Program Counter (PC) and other cpu state information (such as the CS
|
Program Counter (PC) and other CPU state information (such as the CS
|
||||||
segment base value) to find the next basic block.
|
segment base value) to find the next basic block.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to accelerate the most common cases where the new simulated PC
|
In its simplest, less optimized form, this is done by exiting from the
|
||||||
is known, QEMU can patch a basic block so that it jumps directly to the
|
current TB, going through the TB epilogue, and then back to the
|
||||||
next one.
|
main loop. That’s where QEMU looks for the next TB to execute,
|
||||||
|
translating it from the guest architecture if it isn’t already available
|
||||||
|
in memory. Then QEMU proceeds to execute this next TB, starting at the
|
||||||
|
prologue and then moving on to the translated instructions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The most portable code uses an indirect jump. An indirect jump makes
|
Exiting from the TB this way will cause the ``cpu_exec_interrupt()``
|
||||||
it easier to make the jump target modification atomic. On some host
|
callback to be re-evaluated before executing additional instructions.
|
||||||
architectures (such as x86 or PowerPC), the ``JUMP`` opcode is
|
It is mandatory to exit this way after any CPU state changes that may
|
||||||
directly patched so that the block chaining has no overhead.
|
unmask interrupts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In order to accelerate the cases where the TB for the new
|
||||||
|
simulated PC is already available, QEMU has mechanisms that allow
|
||||||
|
multiple TBs to be chained directly, without having to go back to the
|
||||||
|
main loop as described above. These mechanisms are:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
``lookup_and_goto_ptr``
|
||||||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Calling ``tcg_gen_lookup_and_goto_ptr()`` will emit a call to
|
||||||
|
``helper_lookup_tb_ptr``. This helper will look for an existing TB that
|
||||||
|
matches the current CPU state. If the destination TB is available its
|
||||||
|
code address is returned, otherwise the address of the JIT epilogue is
|
||||||
|
returned. The call to the helper is always followed by the tcg ``goto_ptr``
|
||||||
|
opcode, which branches to the returned address. In this way, we either
|
||||||
|
branch to the next TB or return to the main loop.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
``goto_tb + exit_tb``
|
||||||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The translation code usually implements branching by performing the
|
||||||
|
following steps:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Call ``tcg_gen_goto_tb()`` passing a jump slot index (either 0 or 1)
|
||||||
|
as a parameter.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. Emit TCG instructions to update the CPU state with any information
|
||||||
|
that has been assumed constant and is required by the main loop to
|
||||||
|
correctly locate and execute the next TB. For most guests, this is
|
||||||
|
just the PC of the branch destination, but others may store additional
|
||||||
|
data. The information updated in this step must be inferable from both
|
||||||
|
``cpu_get_tb_cpu_state()`` and ``cpu_restore_state()``.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. Call ``tcg_gen_exit_tb()`` passing the address of the current TB and
|
||||||
|
the jump slot index again.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Step 1, ``tcg_gen_goto_tb()``, will emit a ``goto_tb`` TCG
|
||||||
|
instruction that later on gets translated to a jump to an address
|
||||||
|
associated with the specified jump slot. Initially, this is the address
|
||||||
|
of step 2's instructions, which update the CPU state information. Step 3,
|
||||||
|
``tcg_gen_exit_tb()``, exits from the current TB returning a tagged
|
||||||
|
pointer composed of the last executed TB’s address and the jump slot
|
||||||
|
index.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The first time this whole sequence is executed, step 1 simply jumps
|
||||||
|
to step 2. Then the CPU state information gets updated and we exit from
|
||||||
|
the current TB. As a result, the behavior is very similar to the less
|
||||||
|
optimized form described earlier in this section.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Next, the main loop looks for the next TB to execute using the
|
||||||
|
current CPU state information (creating the TB if it wasn’t already
|
||||||
|
available) and, before starting to execute the new TB’s instructions,
|
||||||
|
patches the previously executed TB by associating one of its jump
|
||||||
|
slots (the one specified in the call to ``tcg_gen_exit_tb()``) with the
|
||||||
|
address of the new TB.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The next time this previous TB is executed and we get to that same
|
||||||
|
``goto_tb`` step, it will already be patched (assuming the destination TB
|
||||||
|
is still in memory) and will jump directly to the first instruction of
|
||||||
|
the destination TB, without going back to the main loop.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the ``goto_tb + exit_tb`` mechanism to be used, the following
|
||||||
|
conditions need to be satisfied:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* The change in CPU state must be constant, e.g., a direct branch and
|
||||||
|
not an indirect branch.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* The direct branch cannot cross a page boundary. Memory mappings
|
||||||
|
may change, causing the code at the destination address to change.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note that, on step 3 (``tcg_gen_exit_tb()``), in addition to the
|
||||||
|
jump slot index, the address of the TB just executed is also returned.
|
||||||
|
This address corresponds to the TB that will be patched; it may be
|
||||||
|
different than the one that was directly executed from the main loop
|
||||||
|
if the latter had already been chained to other TBs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Self-modifying code and translated code invalidation
|
Self-modifying code and translated code invalidation
|
||||||
----------------------------------------------------
|
----------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue