mirror of
https://github.com/Motorhead1991/qemu.git
synced 2025-08-04 00:03:54 -06:00
rcu: make memory barriers more explicit
Prepare for introducing smp_mb_placeholder() and smp_mb_global(). The new smp_mb() in synchronize_rcu() is not strictly necessary, since the first atomic_mb_set for rcu_gp_ctr provides the required ordering. However, synchronize_rcu is not performance critical, and it *will* be necessary to introduce a smp_mb_global before calling wait_for_readers(). Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
729c0ddd3c
commit
77a8b8462b
2 changed files with 22 additions and 5 deletions
12
util/rcu.c
12
util/rcu.c
|
@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ static void wait_for_readers(void)
|
|||
atomic_set(&index->waiting, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Here, order the stores to index->waiting before the
|
||||
* loads of index->ctr.
|
||||
/* Here, order the stores to index->waiting before the loads of
|
||||
* index->ctr. Pairs with smp_mb() in rcu_read_unlock(),
|
||||
* ensuring that the loads of index->ctr are sequentially consistent.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_mb();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -142,8 +143,13 @@ static void wait_for_readers(void)
|
|||
void synchronize_rcu(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
qemu_mutex_lock(&rcu_sync_lock);
|
||||
qemu_mutex_lock(&rcu_registry_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Write RCU-protected pointers before reading p_rcu_reader->ctr.
|
||||
* Pairs with smp_mb() in rcu_read_lock().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_mb();
|
||||
|
||||
qemu_mutex_lock(&rcu_registry_lock);
|
||||
if (!QLIST_EMPTY(®istry)) {
|
||||
/* In either case, the atomic_mb_set below blocks stores that free
|
||||
* old RCU-protected pointers.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue