mirror of
https://github.com/Motorhead1991/qemu.git
synced 2025-08-07 09:43:56 -06:00
qapi tests: Elide redundant has_FOO in generated C
The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays. They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start to elide redundant has_FOO in generated C" provided the means to elide them step by step. This is the step for tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json. Said commit explains the transformation in more detail. The invariant violations mentioned there do not occur here. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20221104160712.3005652-6-armbru@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
44ea9d9be3
commit
4b2fc7dbc4
7 changed files with 18 additions and 25 deletions
|
@ -43,15 +43,15 @@ void qmp_user_def_cmd1(UserDefOne * ud1, Error **errp)
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
FeatureStruct1 *qmp_test_features0(bool has_fs0, FeatureStruct0 *fs0,
|
||||
bool has_fs1, FeatureStruct1 *fs1,
|
||||
bool has_fs2, FeatureStruct2 *fs2,
|
||||
bool has_fs3, FeatureStruct3 *fs3,
|
||||
bool has_fs4, FeatureStruct4 *fs4,
|
||||
bool has_cfs1, CondFeatureStruct1 *cfs1,
|
||||
bool has_cfs2, CondFeatureStruct2 *cfs2,
|
||||
bool has_cfs3, CondFeatureStruct3 *cfs3,
|
||||
bool has_cfs4, CondFeatureStruct4 *cfs4,
|
||||
FeatureStruct1 *qmp_test_features0(FeatureStruct0 *fs0,
|
||||
FeatureStruct1 *fs1,
|
||||
FeatureStruct2 *fs2,
|
||||
FeatureStruct3 *fs3,
|
||||
FeatureStruct4 *fs4,
|
||||
CondFeatureStruct1 *cfs1,
|
||||
CondFeatureStruct2 *cfs2,
|
||||
CondFeatureStruct3 *cfs3,
|
||||
CondFeatureStruct4 *cfs4,
|
||||
Error **errp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return g_new0(FeatureStruct1, 1);
|
||||
|
@ -77,8 +77,7 @@ void qmp_test_command_cond_features3(Error **errp)
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
UserDefTwo *qmp_user_def_cmd2(UserDefOne *ud1a,
|
||||
bool has_udb1, UserDefOne *ud1b,
|
||||
UserDefTwo *qmp_user_def_cmd2(UserDefOne *ud1a, UserDefOne *ud1b,
|
||||
Error **errp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
UserDefTwo *ret;
|
||||
|
@ -87,8 +86,8 @@ UserDefTwo *qmp_user_def_cmd2(UserDefOne *ud1a,
|
|||
|
||||
ud1c->string = strdup(ud1a->string);
|
||||
ud1c->integer = ud1a->integer;
|
||||
ud1d->string = strdup(has_udb1 ? ud1b->string : "blah0");
|
||||
ud1d->integer = has_udb1 ? ud1b->integer : 0;
|
||||
ud1d->string = strdup(ud1b ? ud1b->string : "blah0");
|
||||
ud1d->integer = ud1b ? ud1b->integer : 0;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = g_new0(UserDefTwo, 1);
|
||||
ret->string0 = strdup("blah1");
|
||||
|
@ -98,7 +97,6 @@ UserDefTwo *qmp_user_def_cmd2(UserDefOne *ud1a,
|
|||
ret->dict1->dict2->userdef = ud1c;
|
||||
ret->dict1->dict2->string = strdup("blah3");
|
||||
ret->dict1->dict3 = g_new0(UserDefTwoDictDict, 1);
|
||||
ret->dict1->has_dict3 = true;
|
||||
ret->dict1->dict3->userdef = ud1d;
|
||||
ret->dict1->dict3->string = strdup("blah4");
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue