mirror of
https://github.com/Motorhead1991/qemu.git
synced 2025-07-27 12:23:53 -06:00
qapi: Reuse code for flat union base validation
Rather than open-code the check for a valid base type, we should reuse the common functionality. This allows for consistent error messages, and also makes it easier for a later patch to turn on support for inline anonymous base structures. Test flat-union-inline is updated to test only one feature (anonymous branch dictionaries), which can be implemented independently (test flat-union-bad-base already covers the idea of an anonymous base dictionary). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c51b44129
commit
376863ef48
8 changed files with 13 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -560,15 +560,14 @@ def check_union(expr, expr_info):
|
|||
# Else, it's a flat union.
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# The object must have a string member 'base'.
|
||||
if not isinstance(base, str):
|
||||
check_type(expr_info, "'base' for union '%s'" % name,
|
||||
base, allow_metas=['struct'])
|
||||
if not base:
|
||||
raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
|
||||
"Flat union '%s' must have a string base field"
|
||||
"Flat union '%s' must have a base"
|
||||
% name)
|
||||
base_fields = find_base_fields(base)
|
||||
if not base_fields:
|
||||
raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
|
||||
"Base '%s' is not a valid struct"
|
||||
% base)
|
||||
assert base_fields
|
||||
|
||||
# The value of member 'discriminator' must name a non-optional
|
||||
# member of the base struct.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue