Enable conical support settings for ultimaker profiles. Promote conical support out of experimental. Increase minimum diameter from 5 to 10mm.
Relates to PP-230 and CURA-6710
The mininimum bridge wall length was changed to a length long enough to prevent switching of settings over small unsupported areas (e.g. X/Y distance). This was changed in fdmprinters.def.json
Relates to PP-195
Spiralize is meant for models which are solid, but many people don't know and model their things hollow.
With this automatic setting change these people won't notice that they have modeled it wrong.
Which means there are less times I need to explain stuff to users.
Profit.
It's a little bit unclear, but the initial reason we set this to false was because we wanted to make sure most of the 'metal print' releated features dropped in 5.1, not 5.0?
still CURA-8097 .. sort of
Overwhelmingly in our community it seems that the overhang and seam quality is better when printing inside-out.
Ultimaker found that the quality is better (in particular the dimensional accuracy) when printing outside-in. So let them have it outside-in and the rest inside-out.
Made after experimental evidence on Reddit (and in the past on Github).
That way, an extruder profile can say that they want this.
If any extruder needs this setting enabled, it will be enabled for the whole print.
Done as a 5 minute fix.
Enabling this adds more control, possibly improving the productivity of the printer by allowing higher acceleration and jerk rates during travel moves where they have less of an impact.
Disabling this reduces the size of the g-code and the CPU requirements of the printer.
Contributes to issue CURA-8708.
We don't want to filter based on the length of the filtered region, but based on the induced extra line width variation.
This diables the setting for the frontend, but doesn't fully remove it yet. TODO
material_shrinkage_percentage_xy and material_shrinkage_percentage_z cannot depend on material_shrinkage_percentage otherwise their resolve function will not execute properly.
I noticed that the shrinkage factors do not get the correct value if a wrong nozzle is chosen for a material. However, in that case the slicer will also not slice, so in practice this is not an issue
Relates to PP-77
New calculations to determine the average shrinkage when two materials are used. By default the material shrinkage is set to null (None). In that case the shrinkage of that material is not taken into account in the new averaging formula. Support materials such as PVA, BAM, Aquasys etc. should keep this setting to null. When two materials are used with a shrinkage percentage the average of these two materials will be used.
Relates to PP-77
We will only support the Inwards Distributed strategy type from here on out. You can achieve a similar result as that one by adjusting the Wall Distribution Count setting (1 is Center Deviation, 2 is Inwards Distributed, 999999 approximates Distributed).
Contributes to issue CURA-8466.
We've removed a bunch of settings and transformed others. To allow profiles to be checked for these and edited if necessary, we now need to increment this version number.
Contributes to issue CURA-8466.
It is no longer used since we've removed the Fill Gaps Between Walls setting. This setting is no longer referred to from CuraEngine.
Contributes to issue CURA-8466.
