This boolean setting controls whether travel moves to the first point in an
outer wall will always involve a retraction. IMHO, forcing a retraction has
two benefits:
1 - avoids taking the ooze that would occur during the travel to the outer
surface.
2 - the slight pause when un-retracting could help reduce any ripples
introduced by the rapid movement hot-end movement.
The Prusa platform meshes say 'PRUSA' in huge letters. They are not the ABAX printers, though the structure is mostly the same. To prevent confusion I'm removing the platform mesh.
The setting has no effect then, because the ooze shield gets limited to the height of the highest extruder switch and there are no extruder switches in single extrusion prints.
The setting has no effect then, because the ooze shield gets limited to the height of the highest extruder switch and there are no extruder switches in single extrusion prints.
This allows the user to specify in mm^2 the minimum area of infill regions.
Areas smaller than this will be merged into the surrounding skin rather
than being filled with infill.
When the user changes the skin pattern, he'd also expect the skin pattern for layer 0 to change. This commit makes the knowledge prerequisite smaller.
Contributes to pull request #1290.
The origin of the prime tower's coordinates are on the front-right side of the prime tower. We should adjust the minimum and maximum values of the position of the prime tower to account for that, rather than having the limits be based on the centre of the prime tower.
If the prime tower size was too small, it would try to take the root of a negative number. Now we just clamp that computation to 0, which is the correct behaviour for when the minimum volume doesn't fit in the prime tower.
Contributes to issue CURA-3148.
A miscalculation on my part: A negative result of the logarithm would result in a more positive final result for the maximum value, not a negative final result.
Contributes to issue CURA-3137.
