It was decided that functionality present in existing plugins is
sufficient. No need to replicate it in our own codebase and
take on the burden of maintenance
CURA-5479
We wanted it to end up on 0.2mm by default but still scale with any customised horizontal expansion. To do that we need to add the default horizontal expansion here, rather than subtract it, since the horizontal expansion is negative.
Contributes to issue CURA-7537.
The settings for the Ultimaker 3 and Ultimaker 3 Extended should remain the same. The two share their quality profiles and intent profiles, but not their nozzle profiles so this must be copied.
To compensate elephant foot -> initial layer horizontal expansion setting is modeified for engineering and AA0.25 core profile for UMS5 and for UM3 for AA0.4 and AA0.25 cores.
Make it more clear that it's about the vertical tolerance only.
Also correct the interpretation at the end. Inclusive retains more details, while exclusive makes parts fit better, not the other way around.
Contributes to issue #6093.
It turns out that we have another bug in Uranium: Transformations from 3MF files are not applied to the platform mesh. This makes sense because UM.Scene.Platform takes the mesh data (without transformations) from the node that it read and squashes that into the SceneNode for the platform. This SceneNode already has a transformation for the platform offset. The 3MF node also has a transformation from the 3MF's convention to have the origin in the front left. The 3MF reader then squishes the transformation from the node into that.
To fix this we'd need to either:
* separate the transformation of the 3MF file from the transformation from the 3MF convention to have the origin in the front left, so that we can pick and choose, or
* remove the transformation from the 3MF convention and apply it only on loading normal printed meshes, and then modify all of the 3MF platform files.
Both require significant effort. So instead I applied the transformation directly to the vertex data.
To do that I imported the file into Blender using my own Blender plug-in, exported to STL and imported that STL again to apply the transformations, and then exported the file from Blender again.
In Blender I also combined a lot of flat faces together, which reduced the file type losslessly.
Contributes to issue CURA-7534.
