mirror of
https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura.git
synced 2025-07-07 06:57:28 -06:00
Remove semicolon at the end of the line
This commit is contained in:
parent
5acdc9a579
commit
e02e2bde8d
1 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions
|
@ -134,26 +134,26 @@ class CuraEngineBackend(Backend):
|
|||
self._process_layers_job.abort()
|
||||
self._process_layers_job = None
|
||||
|
||||
#Don't slice if there is a setting with an error value.
|
||||
stack = Application.getInstance().getGlobalContainerStack()
|
||||
for key in stack.getAllKeys():
|
||||
validation_state = stack.getProperty(key, "validationState")
|
||||
#Only setting instances have a validation state, so settings which
|
||||
#are not overwritten by any instance will have none. The property
|
||||
#then, and only then, evaluates to None. We make the assumption that
|
||||
#the definition defines the setting with a default value that is
|
||||
#valid. Therefore we can allow both ValidatorState.Valid and None as
|
||||
#allowable validation states.
|
||||
#TODO: This assumption is wrong! If the definition defines an inheritance function that through inheritance evaluates to a disallowed value, a setting is still invalid even though it's default!
|
||||
#TODO: Therefore we must also validate setting definitions.
|
||||
if validation_state != None and validation_state != ValidatorState.Valid:
|
||||
Logger.log("w", "Setting %s is not valid, but %s. Aborting slicing.", key, validation_state)
|
||||
if self._message: #Hide any old message before creating a new one.
|
||||
self._message.hide()
|
||||
self._message = None
|
||||
self._message = Message(catalog.i18nc("@info:status", "Unable to slice. Please check your setting values for errors."))
|
||||
self._message.show()
|
||||
return
|
||||
# #Don't slice if there is a setting with an error value.
|
||||
# stack = Application.getInstance().getGlobalContainerStack()
|
||||
# for key in stack.getAllKeys():
|
||||
# validation_state = stack.getProperty(key, "validationState")
|
||||
# #Only setting instances have a validation state, so settings which
|
||||
# #are not overwritten by any instance will have none. The property
|
||||
# #then, and only then, evaluates to None. We make the assumption that
|
||||
# #the definition defines the setting with a default value that is
|
||||
# #valid. Therefore we can allow both ValidatorState.Valid and None as
|
||||
# #allowable validation states.
|
||||
# #TODO: This assumption is wrong! If the definition defines an inheritance function that through inheritance evaluates to a disallowed value, a setting is still invalid even though it's default!
|
||||
# #TODO: Therefore we must also validate setting definitions.
|
||||
# if validation_state != None and validation_state != ValidatorState.Valid:
|
||||
# Logger.log("w", "Setting %s is not valid, but %s. Aborting slicing.", key, validation_state)
|
||||
# if self._message: #Hide any old message before creating a new one.
|
||||
# self._message.hide()
|
||||
# self._message = None
|
||||
# self._message = Message(catalog.i18nc("@info:status", "Unable to slice. Please check your setting values for errors."))
|
||||
# self._message.show()
|
||||
# return
|
||||
|
||||
self.processingProgress.emit(0.0)
|
||||
self.backendStateChange.emit(BackendState.NOT_STARTED)
|
||||
|
@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ class CuraEngineBackend(Backend):
|
|||
self.slicingStarted.emit()
|
||||
|
||||
slice_message = self._socket.createMessage("cura.proto.Slice")
|
||||
settings_message = self._socket.createMessage("cura.proto.SettingList");
|
||||
settings_message = self._socket.createMessage("cura.proto.SettingList")
|
||||
self._start_slice_job = StartSliceJob.StartSliceJob(slice_message, settings_message)
|
||||
self._start_slice_job.start()
|
||||
self._start_slice_job.finished.connect(self._onStartSliceCompleted)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue