3D-printing/Cura
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura.git synced 2025-07-16 03:07:53 -06:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 2

No need to sort quality groups by type alphabetically

Browse source 
Like, it would put 'draft' first and 'verydraft' last. Just makes no sense. They have unique layer heights already.

Contributes to issue CURA-6600.
This commit is contained in:
Ghostkeeper 2019-09-12 16:44:40 +02:00
parent 9c47fc8e70
commit 603f18ebc9
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 86BEF881AE2CF276
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
cura/Machines/MaterialManager.py
View file

@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ class MaterialManager(QObject):
return results
#
# Used by QualityManager. Built-in quality profiles may be based on generic material IDs such as "generic_pla".
# Built-in quality profiles may be based on generic material IDs such as "generic_pla".
# For materials such as ultimaker_pla_orange, no quality profiles may be found, so we should fall back to use
# the generic material IDs to search for qualities.
#

2
cura/Machines/Models/QualityProfilesDropDownMenuModel.py
View file

@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ class QualityProfilesDropDownMenuModel(ListModel):
quality_group_dict = ContainerTree.getInstance().getCurrentQualityGroups()
item_list = []
for key in sorted(quality_group_dict):
for key in quality_group_dict:
quality_group = quality_group_dict[key]
layer_height = self._fetchLayerHeight(quality_group)